America has been at war since the fall of 2001. There is no end in sight in Afghanistan, Mesopotamia and the Levant, and beyond. What political and strategic disincentives have stalled Washington's ability to responsibly end its involvement in these wars under Republican and Democratic administrations? After spraying down our studio with grain alcohol to kill the virus afflicting the world (Everclear is the unofficial sponsor of this episode, as is an excellent northern Italian vineyard called <a href= "https://cantinapaltrinieri.it/en/home-2/?age-verified=000d4fdece">Paltrinieri</a>), we convened a great group to grapple with the forever wars: Paul Miller of Georgetown, Sarah Kreps of Cornell, and Will Ruger of the Charles Koch Institute and Foundation.    Further reading: <ul> <li>Paul Miller, <a href= "https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/withdrawal-deadlines-in-war-vietnam-iraq-and-afghanistan/">Withdrawal Deadlines in War</a> (Atlantic Council, 2020)</li> <li>Sarah Kreps, <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/019086530X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_thcv_p1_i0">Taxing Wars: The American Way of War Finance and the Decline of Democracy</a> (Oxford University Press, 2018)</li> <li>Will Ruger, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/u-s-strategy-rocks-supporting-fresh-perspectives-foreign-policy/">With U.S. Strategy on the Rocks, We Are Supporting Fresh Perspectives Fresh Perspectives in Foreign Policy</a>," War on the Rocks</li> <li>Paul Miller, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2016/09/how-does-jihadism-end-choosing-between-forever-war-and-nation-building/">How Does Jihadism End? Choosing Between Forever War and Nation Building</a>," War on the Rocks</li> <li>John Kaag and Sarah Kreps, <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0745680984/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_thcv_p1_i1">Drone Warfare</a> (Polity, 2014)</li> <li>Sarah Kreps, <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0199753792/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_hsch_vapi_thcv_p1_i3">Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War</a> (Oxford University Press, 2011)</li> </ul>

America has been at war since the fall of 2001. There is no end in sight in Afghanistan, Mesopotamia and the Levant, and beyond. What political and strategic disincentives have stalled Washington's ability to responsibly end its involvement in these wars under Republican and Democratic administrations? After spraying down our studio with grain alcohol to kill the virus afflicting the world (Everclear is the unofficial sponsor of this episode, as is an excellent northern Italian vineyard called Paltrinieri), we convened a great group to grapple with the forever wars: Paul Miller of Georgetown, Sarah Kreps of Cornell, and Will Ruger of the Charles Koch Institute and Foundation.    Further reading: Paul Miller, Withdrawal Deadlines in War (Atlantic Council, 2020) Sarah Kreps, Taxing Wars: The American Way of War Finance and the Decline of Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2018) Will Ruger, "With U.S. Strategy on the Rocks, We Are Supporting Fresh Perspectives Fresh Perspectives in Foreign Policy," War on the Rocks Paul Miller, "How Does Jihadism End? Choosing Between Forever War and Nation Building," War on the Rocks John Kaag and Sarah Kreps, Drone Warfare (Polity, 2014) Sarah Kreps, Coalitions of Convenience: United States Military Interventions after the Cold War (Oxford University Press, 2011) 

War on the Rocks

Are the Forever Wars Really Forever?

Devour this deep dive into the dash to drop America's drawn-out duel in the domain of the Durrani (and different dynasties): Afghanistan. To help us understand what's transpired and the meaning of the new deal between the United States and the Taliban, Ryan was joined by <a href= "https://areu.org.af/who-we-are/#message_from_the_director">Orzala Nemat</a>, <a href= "https://www.crisisgroup.org/who-we-are/people/laurel-miller">Laurel Miller</a>, and <a href= "https://www.usip.org/people/vikram-j-singh">Vikram J. Singh</a> -- all of whom have many years of experience with America's longest war.   For <a href= "https://warontherocks.com/membership/">members</a>, we have some bonus material (posted in the War Hall): Dr. Nemat tells us what a certain Hamid Karzai has been up to. Want to become a member? Click: <a href= "https://warontherocks.com/membership/">https://warontherocks.com/membership/</a>   Further reading and listening:   <ul> <li>Barnett Rubin, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2020/02/a-tale-of-two-skepticisms-fighting-and-talking-with-the-taliban-during-the-obama-years/">Fighting and Talking with the Taliban During the Obama Years</a>," War on the Rocks</li> <li>Laurel Miller, "<a href= "https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/afghanistan/trump-administrations-afghanistan-policy">The Trump Administration’s Afghanistan Policy</a>," Testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs</li> <li>Vikram Signh, "<a href= "https://www.npr.org/2020/02/18/807117751/behind-the-u-s-taliban-ceasefire-agreement-in-afghanistan">Behind The U.S.-Taliban Ceasefire Agreement In Afghanistan</a>," NPR, interview by Ari Shapiro</li> <li>Chris Brose, Melanie Marlow, Christopher Preble, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2020/03/why-is-america-leaving-afghanistan-now/">Why is America Leaving Afghanistan Now?</a>" Net Assessment</li> <li>John Bew, Ryan Evans, Peter Neumann, and Marisa Porgest, <a href= "https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ICSR-Report-Talking-to-the-Taliban-Hope-over-History.pdf">Talking to the Taliban: Hope over History</a> (ICSR: 2013)</li> </ul>

Devour this deep dive into the dash to drop America's drawn-out duel in the domain of the Durrani (and different dynasties): Afghanistan. To help us understand what's transpired and the meaning of the new deal between the United States and the Taliban, Ryan was joined by Orzala Nemat, Laurel Miller, and Vikram J. Singh -- all of whom have many years of experience with America's longest war.   For members, we have some bonus material (posted in the War Hall): Dr. Nemat tells us what a certain Hamid Karzai has been up to. Want to become a member? Click: https://warontherocks.com/membership/   Further reading and listening:   Barnett Rubin, "Fighting and Talking with the Taliban During the Obama Years," War on the Rocks Laurel Miller, "The Trump Administration’s Afghanistan Policy," Testimony to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs Vikram Signh, "Behind The U.S.-Taliban Ceasefire Agreement In Afghanistan," NPR, interview by Ari Shapiro Chris Brose, Melanie Marlow, Christopher Preble, "Why is America Leaving Afghanistan Now?" Net Assessment John Bew, Ryan Evans, Peter Neumann, and Marisa Porgest, Talking to the Taliban: Hope over History (ICSR: 2013) 

Can America Jaw-Jaw its Way Out of Afghanistan?

In front of a live audience and with red wine in hand, the War on the Rocks podcast closed out an important <a href= "https://www.merrillcenter.sais-jhu.edu/civ-mil-2020">conference on civil-military affairs</a> hosted by the Strategic Studies shop over at the School of Advanced International Studies. The guests of this awesome episode include Mara Karlin, Paula Thornhill, Loren DoJonge Shulman, and Nora Bensahel. Further Reading and Watching: <a href= "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfe9BKeyb24&feature=youtu.be">Watch the conference</a> Paula Thornhill, <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/Demystifying-American-Military-Institutions-Challenges/dp/1682470733">Demystifying the American Military: Institutions Evolution and Challenges Since 1789</a> (Naval Institute Press, 2019) David Barno and Nora Bensahel, <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/Adaptation-under-Fire-Militaries-Bridging/dp/0190672056">Adaptation under Fire: How Militaries Change in Wartime</a> (Oxford University Press, 2020)

In front of a live audience and with red wine in hand, the War on the Rocks podcast closed out an important conference on civil-military affairs hosted by the Strategic Studies shop over at the School of Advanced International Studies. The guests of this awesome episode include Mara Karlin, Paula Thornhill, Loren DoJonge Shulman, and Nora Bensahel. Further Reading and Watching: Watch the conference Paula Thornhill, Demystifying the American Military: Institutions Evolution and Challenges Since 1789 (Naval Institute Press, 2019) David Barno and Nora Bensahel, Adaptation under Fire: How Militaries Change in Wartime (Oxford University Press, 2020)

A Military Straining Against Civilian Control?

Is the U.S. military built and positioned to stop or — if necessary — win the next big war? What should the Navy and Marine Corps of the future look like? What's standing in the way? How can the United States step back from the Middle East and focus on the Pacific? What does The Wire have to teach us about Washington? Why does a member of Congress have a sword, a pull-up bar, and a bottle of Lagavulin 16 in his office? Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin and Chris Brose of Anduril Industries join Ryan for a wide-ranging conversation that tackles these questions and more.    Further Reading, Listening, and Watching: <ul> <li>Mike Gallagher, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2020/02/to-deter-china-the-naval-services-must-integrate/">To Deter China, the Naval Services Must Integrate</a>," War on the Rocks</li> <li>Frank Hoffman, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2014/07/no-strategic-success-without-21st-century-seapower-forward-partnering/">No Strategic Success Without 21st Century Seapower: Forward Partnering</a>," War on the Rocks</li> <li>Alice Hunt Friend, Melanie Marlowe, and Christopher Preble, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2020/02/debating-the-aumfs/">Net Assessment: Debating the AUMFs</a>"</li> <li>"<a href= "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAZZdL1qhk8">Everybody Stays Friends</a>," The Wire</li> <li>Chris Brose and Ryan Evans, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/08/your-ideas-matter-the-making-of-marine-strategic-planning-and-the-future-of-war/">Your Ideas Matter</a>," War on the Rocks</li> </ul>

Is the U.S. military built and positioned to stop or — if necessary — win the next big war? What should the Navy and Marine Corps of the future look like? What's standing in the way? How can the United States step back from the Middle East and focus on the Pacific? What does The Wire have to teach us about Washington? Why does a member of Congress have a sword, a pull-up bar, and a bottle of Lagavulin 16 in his office? Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin and Chris Brose of Anduril Industries join Ryan for a wide-ranging conversation that tackles these questions and more.    Further Reading, Listening, and Watching: Mike Gallagher, "To Deter China, the Naval Services Must Integrate," War on the Rocks Frank Hoffman, "No Strategic Success Without 21st Century Seapower: Forward Partnering," War on the Rocks Alice Hunt Friend, Melanie Marlowe, and Christopher Preble, "Net Assessment: Debating the AUMFs" "Everybody Stays Friends," The Wire Chris Brose and Ryan Evans, "Your Ideas Matter," War on the Rocks 

The Fleet, the Fight, and the Future

The Trump administration made big news recently — and it wasn’t about impeachment. On Jan. 31, the White House announced that it was <a href= "https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-press-secretary-107/"> cancelling the policy</a> that prohibited using anti-personnel landmines outside the Korean peninsula. The subject has been a fraught issue since the early 1990s, when civil society began to respond to the tragic consequences — particularly in the developing world — of the proliferation of landmines. The Clinton administration was a motivating force behind the Ottawa Convention, which banned the use of anti-personnel landmines worldwide, although it didn’t sign the treaty. The Bush administration argued that developing and deploying “smart mines,” that self-destruct after a period time, was consistent with U.S. national interests and humanitarian concerns. Under President Barack Obama, however, the United States committed to implement all of the elements of the Ottawa Convention except on the Korean peninsula, which poses a unique challenge to American defense planners. To discuss the issue, Ryan Evans was joined by <a href= "https://www.rand.org/about/people/j/johnson_david_e.html">David E. Johnson</a> of the RAND Corporation, <a href= "https://www.crisisgroup.org/who-we-are/people/stephen-pomper">Stephen Pomper</a> of the International Crisis Group and formerly of the Obama administration, <a href= "https://twitter.com/luke_j_obrien">Luke O’Brien</a> of War on the Rocks, and <a href= "https://www.hrw.org/about/people/mary-wareham">Mary Wareham</a> of Human Rights Watch.

The Trump administration made big news recently — and it wasn’t about impeachment. On Jan. 31, the White House announced that it was cancelling the policy that prohibited using anti-personnel landmines outside the Korean peninsula. The subject has been a fraught issue since the early 1990s, when civil society began to respond to the tragic consequences — particularly in the developing world — of the proliferation of landmines. The Clinton administration was a motivating force behind the Ottawa Convention, which banned the use of anti-personnel landmines worldwide, although it didn’t sign the treaty. The Bush administration argued that developing and deploying “smart mines,” that self-destruct after a period time, was consistent with U.S. national interests and humanitarian concerns. Under President Barack Obama, however, the United States committed to implement all of the elements of the Ottawa Convention except on the Korean peninsula, which poses a unique challenge to American defense planners. To discuss the issue, Ryan Evans was joined by David E. Johnson of the RAND Corporation, Stephen Pomper of the International Crisis Group and formerly of the Obama administration, Luke O’Brien of War on the Rocks, and Mary Wareham of Human Rights Watch.

Who Needs Landmines?

Many of you have heard of <a href= "https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/">the Doomsday Clock</a> — a decades-old analogue clock meant to symbolize how close we are to nuclear catastrophe. However far we are from midnight, we are told, is how close we are to disaster. More recently, it is also meant to incorporate the risks of catastrophic climate change. It was started by many of the scientists responsible for the creation of the nuclear weapon. And it is, and has always been, run by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. The Bulletin just set the clock to <a href= "https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/">100 seconds to midnight</a> — the closest it’s ever been. On Twitter, Ryan remarked that he didn’t think this exercise added much in the way of value. And so, a debate began. Ryan assembled a group to debate the Doomsday Clock (over Manhattans, appropriately). On one side, <a href= "https://www.nonproliferation.org/experts/miles-pomper/">Miles Pomper</a> of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies and <a href= "https://www.defensepriorities.org/media/profile/benjamin-friedman">Benjamin H. Friedman</a> of Defense Priorities. On the other, <a href="https://www.globalzero.org/about-us/team/">Jon Wolfsthal</a> and <a href= "https://elliott.gwu.edu/sharon-squassoni">Sharon Squassoni</a>, both of whom sit on the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Science and Security Board. And Ryan served as an admittedly biased moderator.

Many of you have heard of the Doomsday Clock — a decades-old analogue clock meant to symbolize how close we are to nuclear catastrophe. However far we are from midnight, we are told, is how close we are to disaster. More recently, it is also meant to incorporate the risks of catastrophic climate change. It was started by many of the scientists responsible for the creation of the nuclear weapon. And it is, and has always been, run by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. The Bulletin just set the clock to 100 seconds to midnight — the closest it’s ever been. On Twitter, Ryan remarked that he didn’t think this exercise added much in the way of value. And so, a debate began. Ryan assembled a group to debate the Doomsday Clock (over Manhattans, appropriately). On one side, Miles Pomper of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies and Benjamin H. Friedman of Defense Priorities. On the other, Jon Wolfsthal and Sharon Squassoni, both of whom sit on the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Science and Security Board. And Ryan served as an admittedly biased moderator.

The Method (or Madness) of Counting the Seconds to Doomsday

Islands have taken on a greater prominence when we talk about the risk of war, especially in Asia. In the Indo-Pacific, islands, reefs, and rocky outcroppings are increasingly an organizing principle for considering security issues. In this episode, Doyle Hodges hosts a conversation on the sidelines of the Bridging the Straits II conference held in Tokyo. Professor Michishita Narushige of the Japanese National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Professor Terry Roehrig of the US Naval War College, Darshana Baruah, a pre-doctoral researcher at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and Dr. Euan Graham, Executive Director of La Trobe Asia, discuss how the unique nature of islands influences Asia-Pacific security, ranging from the security concerns of small island nations in the Indian Ocean to China’s construction and militarization of artificial features in the South China Sea, to territorial disputes between Japan, South Korea, Russia, and China over the possession of small--often uninhabitable or marginally economically viable--islands.

Islands have taken on a greater prominence when we talk about the risk of war, especially in Asia. In the Indo-Pacific, islands, reefs, and rocky outcroppings are increasingly an organizing principle for considering security issues. In this episode, Doyle Hodges hosts a conversation on the sidelines of the Bridging the Straits II conference held in Tokyo. Professor Michishita Narushige of the Japanese National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Professor Terry Roehrig of the US Naval War College, Darshana Baruah, a pre-doctoral researcher at the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, and Dr. Euan Graham, Executive Director of La Trobe Asia, discuss how the unique nature of islands influences Asia-Pacific security, ranging from the security concerns of small island nations in the Indian Ocean to China’s construction and militarization of artificial features in the South China Sea, to territorial disputes between Japan, South Korea, Russia, and China over the possession of small--often uninhabitable or marginally economically viable--islands.

No, Man: It’s an Island

As the world changes, is the nuclear strategy landscape changing or staying remarkably consistent? We had a nice chat about such in lovely Hamburg, courtesy of the Nuclear Studies Research Initiative (NSRI). Don't miss this episode, featuring Fiona Cunningham of George Washington University, Francis Gavin of Johns Hopkins, Ulrich Kühn of the University of Hamburg, and Jane Vaynman of Temple University.

As the world changes, is the nuclear strategy landscape changing or staying remarkably consistent? We had a nice chat about such in lovely Hamburg, courtesy of the Nuclear Studies Research Initiative (NSRI). Don't miss this episode, featuring Fiona Cunningham of George Washington University, Francis Gavin of Johns Hopkins, Ulrich Kühn of the University of Hamburg, and Jane Vaynman of Temple University.

Fission in Hamburg

Have you heard of the 'For Country' caucus? In a political moment defined by acrimony above all else, this caucus brings together members of Congress who have served in the military — Democrats and Republicans. They meet regularly and work together on interests of common concern, including defense, but also beyond. And shortly after the president was impeached, on a week that might be the peak of partisan peevishness, four members of the caucus — Representatives Don Bacon (R-NE), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), and Michael Waltz (R-FL) — sat down with Ryan to explain why they are still friends and what unites them.

Have you heard of the 'For Country' caucus? In a political moment defined by acrimony above all else, this caucus brings together members of Congress who have served in the military — Democrats and Republicans. They meet regularly and work together on interests of common concern, including defense, but also beyond. And shortly after the president was impeached, on a week that might be the peak of partisan peevishness, four members of the caucus — Representatives Don Bacon (R-NE), Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA), and Michael Waltz (R-FL) — sat down with Ryan to explain why they are still friends and what unites them.

Veterans in Congress Come Together 'For Country'

How could symphonies inspire the Army to change the way it selects leaders? The answer might surprise you. Gen. James C. McConville, the Army's 40th chief of staff, has given his marching orders: The Army's top priority is people — more specifically, overhauling talent management. How will future leaders be assessed, selected, and promoted? To understand the huge changes underway, Ryan spoke with Maj. Gen. J.P. McGee, who leads the Army's Talent Management Task Force. McGee gives us a deep look inside his team's efforts, to include a new battalion commander selection process that could lead to a cascade of personnel reforms. If you're in the Army, know anyone in the Army, or are interested in the power of personnel policies, you won't want to miss this. For a transcript of this episode, please click <a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/12/the-armys-new-approach-to-people"> here</a>.

How could symphonies inspire the Army to change the way it selects leaders? The answer might surprise you. Gen. James C. McConville, the Army's 40th chief of staff, has given his marching orders: The Army's top priority is people — more specifically, overhauling talent management. How will future leaders be assessed, selected, and promoted? To understand the huge changes underway, Ryan spoke with Maj. Gen. J.P. McGee, who leads the Army's Talent Management Task Force. McGee gives us a deep look inside his team's efforts, to include a new battalion commander selection process that could lead to a cascade of personnel reforms. If you're in the Army, know anyone in the Army, or are interested in the power of personnel policies, you won't want to miss this. For a transcript of this episode, please click here. 

The Army's New Approach to People

If you read War on the Rocks, you've noticed there's a lively debate over the state of wargaming in the Department of Defense. After senior leaders pushed for a renewed emphasis on wargaming several years ago, are these games any good? Are they doing what they need to be doing for the U.S. military? If not, who is at fault — the gaming community or the customers sitting in the five-sided building? To tackle these questions and more, we gathered a gifted group of gamesome and gallant gamers. Join Ryan's conversation with Ellie Bartels, ED McGrady, and Peter Perla.   Links Jon Compton, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/10/the-obstacles-on-the-road-to-better-analytical-wargaming/">The Obstacles on the Road to Better Analytical Wargaming</a>" Phillip Pournelle, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/10/can-the-cycle-of-research-save-american-military-strategy/">Can the Cycle of Research Save American Military Strategy?</a>" Peter Perla, Web Ewell, Christopher Ma, Justin Peachy, Jeremy Sepinksy, and Basil Tripsas, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/10/rolling-the-iron-dice-from-analytical-wargaming-to-the-cycle-of-research/">Rolling the Iron Dice: From Analytical Wargaming to the Cycle of Research</a>" ED McGrady, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/11/getting-the-story-right-about-wargaming/">Getting the Story Right About Wargaming</a>" Elizabeth Bartels, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2019/11/getting-the-most-out-of-your-wargame-practical-advice-for-decision-makers/">Getting the Most Out of Your Wargame: Practical Advice for Decision-Makers</a>" Robert Work and Paul Selva, "<a href= "https://warontherocks.com/2015/12/revitalizing-wargaming-is-necessary-to-be-prepared-for-future-wars/">Revitalizing Wargaming is Necessary to be Prepared for Future Wars</a>"

If you read War on the Rocks, you've noticed there's a lively debate over the state of wargaming in the Department of Defense. After senior leaders pushed for a renewed emphasis on wargaming several years ago, are these games any good? Are they doing what they need to be doing for the U.S. military? If not, who is at fault — the gaming community or the customers sitting in the five-sided building? To tackle these questions and more, we gathered a gifted group of gamesome and gallant gamers. Join Ryan's conversation with Ellie Bartels, ED McGrady, and Peter Perla.   Links Jon Compton, "The Obstacles on the Road to Better Analytical Wargaming" Phillip Pournelle, "Can the Cycle of Research Save American Military Strategy?" Peter Perla, Web Ewell, Christopher Ma, Justin Peachy, Jeremy Sepinksy, and Basil Tripsas, "Rolling the Iron Dice: From Analytical Wargaming to the Cycle of Research" ED McGrady, "Getting the Story Right About Wargaming" Elizabeth Bartels, "Getting the Most Out of Your Wargame: Practical Advice for Decision-Makers" Robert Work and Paul Selva, "Revitalizing Wargaming is Necessary to be Prepared for Future Wars"

The (War)Games We Play

A few years ago, Ryan recorded a boozy interview with Max Brooks...and then never released it. Who knows why, but it's a fun conversation that you're sure to enjoy during this holiday week. Max is most famous as the author of World War Z, but he has a remarkably diverse collection of works, from <a href= "https://www.maxbrooks.com/the-harlem-hellfighters" data-saferedirecturl= "https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.maxbrooks.com/the-harlem-hellfighters&source=gmail&ust=1574782540995000&usg=AFQjCNHEHDGfnQBo0Z5OP2-kKhSwKG727A">The Harlem Hellfighters</a><a href= "https://www.maxbrooks.com/the-harlem-hellfighters" data-saferedirecturl= "https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.maxbrooks.com/the-harlem-hellfighters&source=gmail&ust=1574782540995000&usg=AFQjCNHEHDGfnQBo0Z5OP2-kKhSwKG727A"> </a>to some unusual episodes of GI Joe. This episode covers a lot of ground, from his body of work, his collaborations with the U.S. military, rum, and being a part of a famous family. Since this episode was first recorded, Max has been a busy guy. He is one of the editors of <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/Strategy-Strikes-Back-Explains-Military/dp/1640120335" data-saferedirecturl= "https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amazon.com/Strategy-Strikes-Back-Explains-Military/dp/1640120335&source=gmail&ust=1574782540995000&usg=AFQjCNHWU4k6KwC5jc-KiPFUIcICUXLhCg"> Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict </a>and has a new horror novel coming out next year called <a href= "https://www.amazon.com/Devolution-Firsthand-Account-Sasquatch-Massacre/dp/1984826786" data-saferedirecturl= "https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amazon.com/Devolution-Firsthand-Account-Sasquatch-Massacre/dp/1984826786&source=gmail&ust=1574782540995000&usg=AFQjCNEqXCOh_HW1kNjoalt8LXd8fgRV7A">Devolution: A Firsthand Account of the Rainier Sasquatch Massacre</a>, which is available for pre-order.

A few years ago, Ryan recorded a boozy interview with Max Brooks...and then never released it. Who knows why, but it's a fun conversation that you're sure to enjoy during this holiday week. Max is most famous as the author of World War Z, but he has a remarkably diverse collection of works, from The Harlem Hellfighters to some unusual episodes of GI Joe. This episode covers a lot of ground, from his body of work, his collaborations with the U.S. military, rum, and being a part of a famous family. Since this episode was first recorded, Max has been a busy guy. He is one of the editors of Strategy Strikes Back: How Star Wars Explains Modern Military Conflict and has a new horror novel coming out next year called Devolution: A Firsthand Account of the Rainier Sasquatch Massacre, which is available for pre-order.

Max Brooks: The Unreleased Interview

Ryan sat down for a conversation Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico to talk about an issue that matters a lot to them and should matter a lot to you: war powers. In her contribution to a new <a href= "https://tnsr.org/roundtable/policy-roundtable-the-war-powers-resolution/">roundtable on war powers</a>, Oona Hathaway has a perfect lede: “The U.S. Congress has not approved a use of force since 2002. And yet the United States certainly has not been at peace in the years since.” Military operations all across the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa are ongoing and expanding. As Hathaway writes elegantly they are all “grounded in capacious readings of Congress’ 2001 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force.” Edward Corwin described the way foreign relations powers are divvied up in the constitution as an “invitation to struggle”. But — as the years since these aging authorizations have demonstrated — it’s not a fair fight, is it? Don’t miss this episode, which pairs well with the new <a href= "https://tnsr.org/roundtable/policy-roundtable-the-war-powers-resolution/">war powers roundtable</a> in the Texas National Security Review.

Ryan sat down for a conversation Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico to talk about an issue that matters a lot to them and should matter a lot to you: war powers. In her contribution to a new roundtable on war powers, Oona Hathaway has a perfect lede: “The U.S. Congress has not approved a use of force since 2002. And yet the United States certainly has not been at peace in the years since.” Military operations all across the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa are ongoing and expanding. As Hathaway writes elegantly they are all “grounded in capacious readings of Congress’ 2001 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force.” Edward Corwin described the way foreign relations powers are divvied up in the constitution as an “invitation to struggle”. But — as the years since these aging authorizations have demonstrated — it’s not a fair fight, is it? Don’t miss this episode, which pairs well with the new war powers roundtable in the Texas National Security Review. 

A Conversation with Sen. Tom Udall about War Powers

What is the proper role of retired general and flag officers in American politics? This is a question that has been debated for a long time, but things have heated up since the 2016 elections due to the prominent role of retired generals in that presidential campaign and in the Trump administration. Even more recently, retired Adm. Bill McRaven <a href= "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/17/opinion/trump-mcraven-syria-military.html"> penned an op-ed</a> that attracted the attention of many, but especially those who study civil-military relations. The <a href= "http://www.iusafs.org/">premiere scholarly society focused</a> on civil-military relations was in town over the weekend, so Ryan decided to have a few people over to War on the Rocks headquarters to sort through it all. He was joined by Risa Brooks, Peter Feaver, Jim Golby, and Alice Hunt Friend.

What is the proper role of retired general and flag officers in American politics? This is a question that has been debated for a long time, but things have heated up since the 2016 elections due to the prominent role of retired generals in that presidential campaign and in the Trump administration. Even more recently, retired Adm. Bill McRaven penned an op-ed that attracted the attention of many, but especially those who study civil-military relations. The premiere scholarly society focused on civil-military relations was in town over the weekend, so Ryan decided to have a few people over to War on the Rocks headquarters to sort through it all. He was joined by Risa Brooks, Peter Feaver, Jim Golby, and Alice Hunt Friend.

The (Four) Stars and the State: Civil-Military Affairs in 2019

“Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial ‘we.’” This line, often attributed to Mark Twain (<a href= "https://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/06/13/we/">it wasn’t him</a>) speaks to the thorny feelings that writers associate with those who shape their prose. Now that the War on the Rocks editorial team has grown so much, we thought this was a good opportunity for you to get to know our Washington-based editors a bit better: Doyle Hodges, Shane Mason, and Rebecca Zimmerman. Oh, and you get to know podcast maestro Tre Hester a bit better too. This team combines career experience in the U.S. Navy, various think tanks, in the fields and headquarters of Afghanistan, to low-budget music tour vans. If you’re interested in their career trajectories, mentors who made a difference, how to be a civilian in a military dominated environment (or vice versa), the books and plays they love, hard-earned professional lessons, or just better knowing the people who wield the red pen, you’ll enjoy this one.

“Only kings, presidents, editors, and people with tapeworms have the right to use the editorial ‘we.’” This line, often attributed to Mark Twain (it wasn’t him) speaks to the thorny feelings that writers associate with those who shape their prose. Now that the War on the Rocks editorial team has grown so much, we thought this was a good opportunity for you to get to know our Washington-based editors a bit better: Doyle Hodges, Shane Mason, and Rebecca Zimmerman. Oh, and you get to know podcast maestro Tre Hester a bit better too. This team combines career experience in the U.S. Navy, various think tanks, in the fields and headquarters of Afghanistan, to low-budget music tour vans. If you’re interested in their career trajectories, mentors who made a difference, how to be a civilian in a military dominated environment (or vice versa), the books and plays they love, hard-earned professional lessons, or just better knowing the people who wield the red pen, you’ll enjoy this one.

Kings, Presidents, Editors, and People with Tapeworms

Great discussions with security, defense, and foreign policy experts recorded over drinks.

hubhopper

War on the Rocks

hubhopper